Key Findings
•Committee work not linked to resource allocation,
planning and Ed. Master Plan
•Some committees had not met since the Years: 2000, 2002
and 2005
•Committee recommendations ignored/not implemented by
administration
•Dysfunctional committees: lack of leadership, lack of
follow-through, lack of clerical support,
faculty & staff unwilling to serve (vacancies)
•Unilateral decisions made by administrative
chairs-faculty window dressing
•Lack of transparency and open on-going communication
•Committees met sporadically and reacted to issues not
proactive
•The 16 committees were not assessed for effectiveness
since their development
•Despite challenges the curriculum, technology, &
student policy committees limped along